> get your facts straight *reports facts as given to me by author of article* > they're required to wait *updated comment fron USMC confirms adsep* my friend, does "4thewin" mean the same thing as "being wrong" to you? If so, nice work.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
That's rich coming from the person who seriously thought the Marine Corps was going to keep a white supremacist that had just been convicted via court martial. Instead of waiting for more information you had a Twitter freakout.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nerdery4thewin
You mean like how they kept Michael Chesney for almost a year? Gosh where would I get that impression?
2 replies 0 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
shows that you don't know what you're talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nerdery4thewin
oh weird how none of those things apply in this case. kinda fun how you're just making stuff up because you can't handle being wrong. i actually know precisely when Chesney's adsep started so the irony here is rich
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @nerdery4thewin
If you knew what you were talking about, you'd know that Chesney was arrested simultaneously with another Marine, who faced the same issues and was processed out much faster, so literally none of your explanations hold.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Again: that's not how it works. Just because one case followed a given path does not mean the other has to. The different duty stations and commands alone can mean drastically different timelines. Again: if you had any clue about how the military works then you'd know that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nerdery4thewin
Congrats for affirming my initial point that it was a very real possibility that he could have stayed in the Marines for several more months. Glad we had this talk, next time you can just assume I'm right.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
How? All it means is that they had less of a wait time. That's an admin issue, not something done for his benefit. But I guess everyone must defer to your opinions about an organization you have never been in, and know nothing about?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nerdery4thewin
me: "The Marines are apparently keeping this guy around for a bit, according to all available information from the Marine spokesperson. He could still be separated later though." you: "LOL NO THEY NOT" also you: "I MEAN MAYBE THEY ARE"
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
Emily G Retweeted Emily G
You're tweet came some 40ish hours after this one, which is in the same thread. So not only are you shitty at logic and facts, you're shitty at reading.https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/1009141366574735360 …
Emily G added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.