So, I guess I'd just been lucky enough to dodge it for a long time, but I found out about a FB group (modded/created by @TravisWizard) that featured a draft of female Magic personalities based on their bangability.
I'm shaking I'm so angry.
-
-
Here's the (now deleted) thread. I originally didn't want to post this in order to protect the people in the comments, but these aren't new comments to anyone in the thread. Hopefully accountability will be a new something for those posting.pic.twitter.com/fdXcLXvwKD
Show this thread -
-
New conversation -
-
-
Fuck. I've done such a good job holding it together this weekend, and now I'm just sitting on the couch crying. I don't get it. I look at these photos and see a group of incredibly talented, driven women who I either look up to or consider good friends. Why are people so shitty?
-
LITERALLY SAME.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I have to ask... If this was just who is your favorite female magic personality would this be bad?? This is a real question?
-
Not at all. The issue is in the sexualization.
-
Good! I would like to say though there is a fine line between sexualization and calling someone attractive, part of it is word choice and and another part is how the person receives what was said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nazi apologist AND misogynist creeper!

-
Travis is not involved at all in this thread.
-
He runs the group, and this post had been up since at least June (note the Pride reacts). Either he's a shitty moderator or he's complicit.
-
You can blame him for being a shitty moderator. Hell, how many online communities out there have at least half-decent moderation? Very few. It's ridiculously time consuming, and most of the time not remunerated. But calling him complicit is a logical extreme.
-
He's not complicit in its creation. He becomes complicit in its existence once he sees it, could delete it, and chooses not to.
-
You have to read the whole thing to even know what's going on. Knowing its existence is not enough to be considered complicit. Now drop the pitchforks or at least stop @ ing me.
-
He's not complicit in its creation. He becomes complicit in its existence once he reads the thread, could delete it, and chooses not to.
-
Ive seen it and deleted it now
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You can't just dox people like that, at least scribble out the names.
-
It's not doxxing to repost something posted in public, even if it's a closed group.
-
Ya doxxing usually involves inciting action, emails, phone numbers, addresses etc
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.