The first amendment protects free expression, even for Russian propaganda outlets like the one you work for. It doesn’t protect criminals who weaponize stolen information.https://twitter.com/dancohen3000/status/1116380844829097984 …
WikiLeaks' publications from 2016 are not the focus of any charge against Assange, so your ill-informed and incorrect statement is irrelevant to begin with. https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/11/assange-prosecution-will-focus-on-chelsea-manning-era-releases-not-dnc-emails/ …
-
-
This is the quality of the politicians we have. They don't know what is really being charged and they don't understand the constitution. Let me correct that. They could care less about the laws of United States, the Constitution or international laws. They're all criminals
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reprehensible that so many organizations like the House Foreign Affairs Committee first off are misinforming ppl as to why Assange is being indicted. And second, they apparently are in favor of war crimes (which is what he is being indicted on) & the corruption he also exposed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cut the BS, we all know Why US wants Assange. Because Hillary and the elite want him made example of. So Journalist never think of Free Press or Speech again. Surely you can make official reasons all you want. That is NEVER the truth.
#FreeAssangeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.