Today's SCOTUS decision, Ramos, is such a goddamn mess it'll make the court watching both siders THRILLED. "See, it's about LAW, not POLITICS" they'll say.
-
-
One would have to assume they're going to lay the legal framework by which they will find 1 juror to declare Donald Trump innocent
-
Please seek help.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So substantive due process rights are bastard children, right? There’s no longer 5 votes on the court for locating non-enumerated rights in the Due Process Clause?
-
Someone had to put a stop to the piling on that pop culture is currently doing to our law enforcement organizations. Thank god there's some common sense at SCOTUS these days,.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is like the ACA decision when states got to opt out of Medicaid. Unanimous jury, but guts due process. SCOTUS sucks. Thanks for being there for us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmmm... maybe we're thinking of different people. CT has been a HUGE strict interpreter of 14A. Perhaps what you're really trying to say is that CT declines to broadly interpret 14A in a way that supports social engineering efforts that bypass elected legislatures?
-
I mean, these are words.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
can't wait until you figure out where in the Constitution the privileges and immunities clause is located.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean, the guy has only himself to quote to explain why Dred Scott was wrongly decided:pic.twitter.com/H1dsFUaDoA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps that is not a reflection on Justice Thomas as you believe it is?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.