Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce ElieNYC
Elie Mystal
Elie Mystal
Elie Mystal
Ovjeren akaunt
@ElieNYC

Tweets

Elie MystalOvjeren akaunt

@ElieNYC

Justice Correspondent: @thenation Alignment: Neutral Good. Str:12 Dex:8 Con:15 Int:13 Wis:10 Char:14 Class: Paladin. Strong Against: Republicans.

NYC
thenation.com/authors/elie-m…
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2009.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
    • Prijavi Tweet

    All right let's do this: Sleight of hand #1: Dersh says he will analyze why the Framers chose the words they did as "the sole criteria for impeachment." Nope, nothing in the doc says "SOLE CRITERIA." That's a trick he learned from FedSoc, requiring textual fealty.

    16:55 - 27. sij 2020.
    • 3.979 proslijeđenih tweetova
    • 13.046 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
    • Chris  WA State Lea Grant Alys Corduroy John Deas Susie Gemmell Lisa Myers Anne Reed Laura Covello #FairTrial #Witnesses #Liz 🌹
    251 reply 3.979 proslijeđenih tweetova 13.046 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      1. Novi razgovor
      2. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #2: Dersh is saying that you need a stated crime. That's the opposite of the position he's taken his whole career until five seconds ago.

        40 replies 842 proslijeđena tweeta 4.305 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      3. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #3: His throwing out a lot of things that sound like historical "fact" to establish his credibility. He's trying to make the Senators think that he is smarter and more learned than they. Almost every "fact" he's stated thus far, is irrelevant.

        45 replies 661 proslijeđeni tweet 3.715 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      4. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        People do this all the time when talking about sports: "Honus Wagner, Cal Ripiken, Derek Jeter, these are all shortstops! GREAT ones. You might not know all these shortstops, but they ARE! I know shortstops and... Eli Manning is NO SHORTSTOP!"

        25 replies 337 proslijeđenih tweetova 2.531 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      5. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #4: Dersh says that he's not implying that the Senate is not "legally bound" to the arguments that impeachment requires a crime. FOLKS, DERSH JUST GAVE AWAY THE WHOLE GAME. If the Senate, in it's power, is not legally bound to find a crime, THEN A CRIME IS UNNECESSARY.

        69 replies 1.379 proslijeđenih tweetova 4.956 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      6. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Literally EVERYTHING he says going forward is just a fancy show. He gave you the ANSWER right up top: the Senate CAN impeach for any reason they want to. The question is only if they want to. It has NOTHING TO DO with the finding of a crime. Game set match.

        28 replies 843 proslijeđena tweeta 3.821 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      7. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        For those playing along at home, they do this on the bar exam ALL THE TIME. They'll give you this very long fact pattern. The *answer* will be in the very first sentence. But they'll spend a whole page trying to distract you from the answer they gave you RIGHT UP TOP.

        27 replies 565 proslijeđenih tweetova 3.311 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      8. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Dersh: For Congress to ignore the words of the Constitution itself, would place Congress about the law. Again, Dersh JUST TOLD YOU that Congress can do just that. You're just supposed to forget that as he continues talking. #ImpeachmentTrial

        14 replies 461 proslijeđeni tweet 2.608 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      9. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #5: This is more a FedSoc thing than a Dersh thing. See when the FedSoc wants the Constitution to say something it doesn't say: they use what Framers said BEFORE they put in the language, and argue that the actual text INCLUDES that larger conversation about the text.

        9 replies 544 proslijeđena tweeta 2.502 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      10. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        When FedSoc ONLY wants the Constitution to say what the bare text suggests, as they do here, the use all the Framer debate around the text as a REJECTION of everything other than what actually made it into the text.

        6 replies 443 proslijeđena tweeta 2.322 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      11. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        So, you can see, in this way, the originalists can make the Constitution say whatever they want it to say. The can change whether the text is INCLUSIVE of larger debates, or EXCLUSIVE, depending on which way fits the Republican agenda as they need it to.

        36 replies 560 proslijeđenih tweetova 2.705 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      12. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #6: Dersh makes the baseless claim that the inclusion of "other high crimes and misdemeanors" does NOT include "abuse of power." He's got no historical evidence that "abuse of power" was specifically excluded by the Framers. Because, of course they excluded no such thing.

        18 replies 498 proslijeđenih tweetova 2.392 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      13. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #7: He's arguing that the inclusion of non-criminal language to support impeachment (Which, AGAIN, DERSH ADMITS THAT NON-CRIMINAL REASONS EXIST IN THE CONSTITUTION TO REMOVE A POTUS), was only for mental or physical incapacity. Evidence? Lol, it's Derh y'all.

        20 replies 399 proslijeđenih tweetova 2.063 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      14. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        I feel like I'm being forced to take an issue-spotter, live, and at rapid speed. I've basically had nightmares about this. With @ewarren giving me a grade at the end.

        56 replies 235 proslijeđenih tweetova 2.185 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      15. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #8: Dersh is trying to parse... the jurisdiction of the court of impeachment from... the grounds for impeachment itself. His argument only works if you think there is SPACE between what the House can impeach FOR, and what the Senate can convict for. Which there ISN'T.

        10 replies 394 proslijeđena tweeta 1.966 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      16. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        All right, well here's something: UNLIKE STARR... Dershowtiz at least admits his hypocrisy. He says that he hadn't "researched" impeachment thoroughly enough when he spoke about the Clinton impeachment. One only imagines what new thing he'll research for his next defendant.

        29 replies 320 proslijeđenih tweetova 2.000 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      17. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #9: Omg, he's talking about the rule of lenity. Okay peeps, this is an OLD standard of interpretation that says, basically, "tie goes to the defendant." If we still applied this rule today, we'd have to release more prisoners than I can estimate.

        16 replies 352 proslijeđena tweeta 1.830 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      18. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Basically, we get out of "lenity" today by striking laws that are not sufficiently *definite* by ruling them unconstitutional as to vagueness. I imagine that Dersh would LIKE to say Impeachment is unconstitutionally vague, but he can't so... lenity.

        16 replies 272 proslijeđena tweeta 1.565 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      19. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #10: Dersh is making an argument for why Abuse of Power should NOT be grounds for impeachment. Because basically, it can be used politically. Maybe, but of import here, Abuse of Power IS ground for impeachment, whether Dersh thinks it's a good idea or not.

        14 replies 348 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.804 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      20. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Dersh is arguing motive, like a good criminal defense attorney. Unfortunately for Dersh, @realDonaldTrump actually told us his motive. On the call, he asked for an investigation into his political rivals. Motive established, counselor.

        18 replies 434 proslijeđena tweeta 2.068 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      21. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #11: NOW Dersh is arguing that even if Abuse of Power is impeachable, ordering a quid pro quo is okay. And then he gives a bad analogy, and says quid pro quo alone is not an abuse of power.

        261 proslijeđeni tweet 1.394 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      22. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        "Nothing in the Bolton revelations would rise to the level of abuse of power." ... this is just wrong. He's wrong, because tying a quid pro quo to FOREIGN ELECTION INTERFERENCE, is the abuse of power. #ImpeachmentTrial

        18 replies 471 proslijeđeni tweet 2.069 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      23. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        International deal making: not an abuse of power. International election interference: clearly an abuse of power.

        8 replies 365 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.728 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      24. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #12: He's back to maladministration, arguing that when it was rejected, they also rejected abuse of power. He's got nothing here. He keeps saying it together as if repetition makes it so, but he's got no quote or, PRECEDENT, saying that abuse of power is not impeachable.

        8 replies 284 proslijeđena tweeta 1.468 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      25. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        "By expressly rejecting maladministration, they implicitly rejected abuse." Again, he hasn't come CLOSE to establishing that using any legal means: precedents, texts, nothing. He's using the word "implicit" to serve the function of "take my word for it."

        15 replies 274 proslijeđena tweeta 1.525 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      26. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #13: He's naming all these things that the President might be impeached for (tweets, policies) and saying that this is the danger of "standardless impeachment." YEAH BUT, he's not being impeach FOR A TWEET now is he, Dersh.

        11 replies 294 proslijeđena tweeta 1.595 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      27. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        This, per usual, is the intellectually soft "slippery-slope" argument. Let's just name some other random things that *could* happen (but won't) if we do this ONE thing that clearly should happen. Slippery slope arguments deserve C's.

        11 replies 247 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.503 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      28. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #14: "abuse of power and obstruction of congress are so far from what the Founders intended..." You'll notice that this is the first time he's mentioned the obstruction charge. He doesn't even have an argument for obstruction, he's just roping it in there.

        9 replies 262 proslijeđena tweeta 1.344 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      29. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        I mean, he's just spent an hour trying to explain why Abuse of Power isn't what the founders thought, but has spent no time explaining why the violation of separation of power INHERENT in the obstruction of Congress charge, should also not be in there.

        8 replies 258 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.348 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      30. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Dersh is just out here *really* counting on people being slower and dumber than he is. And I'm just not. I've seen all these tricks before. The game moves slower when you can see the laces spinning on the ball.

        45 replies 350 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.865 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      31. Elie Mystal‏Ovjeren akaunt @ElieNYC 28. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Sleight #15: Dersh is complaining that because his arguments have been roundly rejected by nearly everybody with standing, people should take his arguments seriously. My four year old asks me to do this all the time.

        28 replies 400 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.977 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      32. Još 5 drugih odgovora

    Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

    Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

      Sponzorirani tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • O Twitteru
      • Centar za pomoć
      • Uvjeti
      • Pravila o privatnosti
      • Imprint
      • Kolačići
      • Informacije o oglasima