So you never had any good reason to infer that? You just said without cause? Well that's stupid and doesn't prove anything. See, if I infer from Crowder that he might be bigoted, it's because I have things I can point to. Do you see the difference there?
-
-
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
Inferring something from someone's speech is a bad way of finding out someones views since it is likely going to be biased, If i look at a speech given by someone i strongly disagree with i am sure i can start to infer negative things about their views, but again because...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @SortofSalient and
There would be no concrete proof of it it would be a bad idea for finding out someone's views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
Cool. So if we just assume liars don't exist, then your approach is totally valid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
Of course, liars exist but unless you can read minds it is impossible to know if someone is truly lying.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
So we should just take everyone at their word? Just trust everything everyone says all the time?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
When it comes to statements by well-known people, then yes unless you have evidence that proves what they say is incorrect, It is, of course, ok to doubt but to just assume that it is all a lie with no proof is not a good way for finding out someone's views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
Ok. So when Hillary said that her storing emails on her private server was innocuous and not for ill intent, we should just believe her. Right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
No because their is evidence proving that, that was not the case
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
There is no evidence to prove what her intent was. We can't read her mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I am not talking about what she said I am talking about evidence, Not Words, Evidence, What you were saying was that we can infer things based on words instead of relying only on evidence
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.