That is mocking a Nationality which is done by everyone, Every nationality has stereotypical actions like the British being posh or the Americans being obese or the Irish being drunk, Jokes about this are made by everyone, So I think it is wholly unreasonable to say that...
-
-
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
I've already addressed this point. It depends on why you mock the nationality. British people in the United States, were never the target of racial derision and mistreatment. Irish, Chinese, Mexican people are were/are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
So because at some point a certain group of people have been mistreated we can never joke about their nationality again?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
But if a person with a history of targeting jokes at certain groups and who has expressed views that may be prejudiced, is making Chinese racist jokes, I'm less inclined to interpret their motivation charitably. Do you understand?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
Well, he is a comedian so he will end up targeting groups with jokes, But secondly when has he very expressed views that are prejudiced?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
He is anti-immigration and that's suspect, he spent the better part of his video speaking towards Maza mocking the man's speech, sexual orientation, and mannerisms. He has his "Socialism is for f*gs" shirt. He has done stereotypical caricatures of trans and Chinese people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
Being anti Immigration is not always down to to prejudice you can be anti-immigration for other reasons, Secondly, he mocked his speech yes as a joke, Thirdly while he may have mocked his orientation he only ever referred to him by using words that Carlos has used to refer to...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
Ok whatever, this conversation is boring now. I'm curious about something. Earlier you said you might infer from some things I've said that I'm racist What were they? I think if we broke that down a bit, it could get to the heart of why we disagree so much.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @makutadesrex and
I don't have any, the point of that was to say that simply 'inferring' something with no proof is a very bad way of finding out someone's views since they will often be used by people to claim that people secretly have outrageous views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @makutadesrex and
So you never had any good reason to infer that? You just said without cause? Well that's stupid and doesn't prove anything. See, if I infer from Crowder that he might be bigoted, it's because I have things I can point to. Do you see the difference there?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Inferring something from someone's speech is a bad way of finding out someones views since it is likely going to be biased, If i look at a speech given by someone i strongly disagree with i am sure i can start to infer negative things about their views, but again because...
-
-
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @SortofSalient and
There would be no concrete proof of it it would be a bad idea for finding out someone's views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.