Under this definition, political groups could be added into the equation of what is considered Hate Speech whereas in the UK it is defined as Expressions of hatred toward someone on account of that person's colour, race, disability, nationality, Under this definition it does...
-
-
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
You left out half that definition that doesn't suit your narrative. This is the full definition. "abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
That can still include political groups since it says that it mainly especially and not only so on that basis Twitter would be committing hate speech by banning Conservatives on the basis of their politics.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
Can you reasonably demonstrate that banning someone from Twitter constitutes a form of abuse or a threat?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
It can certainly have an indirect effect on causing abuse since it means a person can be condemned and lied about on Twitter and they will not be able to rebut it which could have serious Psychological effects
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
Wow. It's almost like cruel and derisive comments about people can have a prolonged, detrimental effect, on their psychology. Makes you think about the importance of political correctness and fighting hate speech, doesn't it?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
People should be allowed to say anything they want, The only bar should be on threats, Most people will the have the decency to not insult everyone but it is quite simply an Orwellian tactic to try and ban insults, What i am saying is that banning someone from rebuting...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
Now imagine conservatives are the ones doing this, and it's LGBT people or minorities suffering the brunt of this. Do you see why that's something Twitter might not want to allow? It interferes with the free speech of the people on their platform. And as you said, that's bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
People should be allowed to say what they want with the only bar being threats, If someone chooses not to use a platform because they don't like insults then that's on them, Lets imagine this was the other way around and only LGBT people were being banned...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
LGBT isn't a chosen ideology. Conservatism is. False equivalency.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Ok, et's say Socialism them, If Socialists were only being banned then I would oppose it vehemently, however, I would not oppose the speech because again everyone should be able to say what they want we do not need a corporation to regulate the manners of their users.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.