I did, was just being hopeful
I understand Wikipedia isn’t an amazing source, but it is backed up with references, if you want to go through all those too! It’s only the first paragraph I was referencing
-
-
Can we all agree that June last year, someone close to Assange (can’t recall who) admitted Seth Rich really was the source of the DNC leaks and the trollbots the Mueller report mentions only posted memes like these?pic.twitter.com/BXHj0UPMWY
-
I am not convinced that Rich was the source, it was Kim dot Com who said that. It WAS a leak not a hack - based on the download times in the meta data of the files, it shows that it was likely a USB transfer - The NSA would have proof if the files went over the internet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wikipedia is as reliable as the owned entities that somehow manage to retain the designation of “reliable sources”, despite being shown to be completely disrespectful of the truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
UBI Advocate |