I think it's ridiculous to not have a system which can't react quickly to changes. The electoral college was an amendment to the constitution. Were those who made that amendment arrogant?
-
-
Replying to @ElJeppy @DailyMail
Instituting a republic election system to a republic isn’t all that contrary to the founders beliefs bud.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Matt95261304 @DailyMail
Mmmhmm the current system favors your political beliefs because it gives more representation to the minority you belong to. That should and will change as it should. Enjoy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @DailyMail
You say “current system” as if it hasn’t existed to some extent since 1787. You misreprenting my thoughts on the electoral college certainly doesn’t justify your claim. In all seriousness you should look into why we use the electoral college and the founders thoughts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Matt95261304 @DailyMail
You should and also examine it's ties to slavery. Oh that was another thing condoned by the founding fathers. What arrogance when that was overturned in an amendment! The length of a system in and of itself doesn't set in stone. Anyway bye
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @DailyMail
The constitution was the document of reason that was essential in abolishing slavery and again in civil rights equality. You’d know that if you understood the history of the US but then again considering this conversation I see that’s too much to ask.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Matt95261304 @DailyMail
The ability to amend the constitution is key. You want to believe that the things that benefit your particular ideology are sacrosanct. What arrogance. The electoral college is unfit for purpose and needs reform.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @DailyMail
Just because you don’t understand the electoral college’s purpose does not mean it should be eliminated. Im arrogant because I agree with the founders in their ideas of the electoral process that have been beneficial for the last two centuries? Yeah, I’m the arrogant one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Matt95261304 @DailyMail
It is no longer fit for purpose. When the minority of people have a greater say in who governs them than the majority that's a broken system. The constitution allows amendment as it's supposed to evolve. You not accepting that is beyond arrogant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @DailyMail
The country is broken up into different regions (called states) with different needs hence why the electoral college is needed when considering some states are larger than others. You still have to give smaller states a voice. Btw I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 dipshit
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Every state gets two senators to represent them regardless of size therefore all states have an equal say. A system which can elect a chief executive via a minority of votes is broken. I don't care who you voted for and don't understand why you feel the need to call me names.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.