I've never seen one. Perhaps you're in some particularly nasty groups.
-
-
Go look around. You'll find them. I have reported dozens and not a single one "violated the terms" or was removed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I saw supporters of Trump like Lin Wood calling for the execution of the VP to millions of his supporters. I saw Trump and his enablers inciting trouble via their lies, bullshit and baseless allegations. I then saw the direct result on the 6th. Whataboutism doesn't work now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Pointing out a double standard is not "whataboutism." If the problem is violent rhetoric then the problem is violent rhetoric. What we're seeing is that "violent rhetoric" is not the issue - it's who is saying it that is the issue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's a clear false equivalency. You're comparing nutters on the Internet to the sitting US president.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Factsarefacts Retweeted Donald Trump Jr.
It will always be "different" though, won't it? "Well, he's the POTUS!" or "well, this what the CAPITOL building." Open your eyes.https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1300397571538640901?s=20 …
Factsarefacts added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh behave. Trump and his enablers were attacking the democratic process with lies, bullshit and baseless allegations. They were doing this to placate his sociopathic ego and incite the rage you saw on the 6th. Private companies removing his "megaphone" was beyond justified.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Hillary still maintains that Trump stole the election. Stacy Abrams still maintains that her election was stolen and she never conceded. They are both heroes. It's not about the integrity of democratic process.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No it's about the clear and present danger Trump and his enablers continue to present to the democratic process. Those he incited on the 6th were trying to prevent that process with violence. You understand that right? His lies didn't work in court so he incited insurrection.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, it's about you excusing the divisive rhetoric that you like, and clutching your pearls at the divisive rhetoric that you don't like. It is unbecoming of a man to engage in that kind of thing. Check yourself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You'll probably think me blocking you is censorship. It's not. You're just an ignorant arsehole trying to defend the indefensible and I have paint to watch dry. Bye 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.