We have a constitution based on precedent and rulings from our supreme court and previous courts. The supreme court based their ruling on parliaments sovereignty from precedent set back in 1604. Are you actually contesting parliamentary sovereignty?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In a representative democracy it is given to our representatives in parliament. They then seek to represent ALL their constituents best interests. You're really having a hard time with this basic concept.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
We do. That's why they represent the best interests of us all and not the specific wishes of a few. Would you prefer an XFactor style voting system?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That would be their job. So yes. If for instance the EU turned into the monster you were manipulated to believe it was in 2016 then I would expect our representatives to follow that golden rule. They react to changing events that's why we have human MPs and not automatons.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think millions voted in that vein. What can't be ignored though is those who voted upon the false promises and lies. We also can't tell who voted based on "project fear". It's why I would never support a revocation without an informed and legally binding referendum.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I had no expectations of you seeing any form of light or indeed right. That I believe an issue of such momentous import affecting this country for generations, should be carefully dealt with should be universally shared. Your "you lost get over it" BS is quite frankly disgusting.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.