It would have been overturned if it had been legally binding. The high court said that.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
That would be their job. So yes. If for instance the EU turned into the monster you were manipulated to believe it was in 2016 then I would expect our representatives to follow that golden rule. They react to changing events that's why we have human MPs and not automatons.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think millions voted in that vein. What can't be ignored though is those who voted upon the false promises and lies. We also can't tell who voted based on "project fear". It's why I would never support a revocation without an informed and legally binding referendum.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Our representatives are paid to represent us. Their job is to react to change etc. We vote them in to parliament to think not just blindly follow. Surely you can't disagree with that?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.