Are you honestly saying that the direction and impact of Brexit is what it was sold as in 2016. A final say is to ensure the people want to pay the new price. It's pretty simple.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not if it's done as a legally binding, untainted and informed referendum. Implementation via legislation based on the result. 2016 was none of these things. It's why we are where we are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @SteveBakerHW
You are biased you don’t see the opposite sides views. You see lies only from this side, the biggest lies were claiming a recession and mass job losses. It doesn’t need to be legally binding, our elected representatives are honourable enough or should be to enact our decision
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chatta290 @SteveBakerHW
And you're not biased? You happily ignore the failings of 2016 because your "side" won.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @SteveBakerHW
I mean this is one video I can’t get over. This was all project fear:pic.twitter.com/PxzCSIFHsg
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chatta290 @SteveBakerHW
No deal was also described as project fear by the remain campaign. Easy deals, better than we currently have, knocked off in an afternoon, we hold all the cards. That was the remain campaign. No doom no gloom.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Sheer madness. We never held all the cards and unlike the leave campaign stated the EU doesn't need us more than them. It was even suggested that the likes of BMW would force the EU to give us anything we asked for.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.