Are you honestly saying that the direction and impact of Brexit is what it was sold as in 2016. A final say is to ensure the people want to pay the new price. It's pretty simple.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not if it's done as a legally binding, untainted and informed referendum. Implementation via legislation based on the result. 2016 was none of these things. It's why we are where we are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @SteveBakerHW
You are biased you don’t see the opposite sides views. You see lies only from this side, the biggest lies were claiming a recession and mass job losses. It doesn’t need to be legally binding, our elected representatives are honourable enough or should be to enact our decision
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chatta290 @SteveBakerHW
And you're not biased? You happily ignore the failings of 2016 because your "side" won.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @SteveBakerHW
No, some lies were told but not to the extent you make out, not ones which would have ever swayed the vote. You also fail to realise many decided on their decision long before it was even announced
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @chatta290 @SteveBakerHW
How many of the 17.4 million voted based on the campaign?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
It matters because if their decision was based on lies and unicorns it taints the result.
10:35 AM - 21 Oct 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.