I see people on both sides of the debate are getting the letter/extension thing wrong. - The side-letters are irrelevant. The PM asked for an extension and it will be treated as such. - Both “defiant Boris refuses to sign letter” and “he broke the law” takes are misleading.
His intention, though, in seeking to frustrate no matter how infantile is still of concern?
-
-
That's what I think. Regardless of the requirements of the Benn Act being met, isn't there still a case to be made for trying to frustrate. His letter to his MPs is clear evidence of that in my unqualified opinion.pic.twitter.com/X2ub0E9IJB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.