It cannot be the right answer to the big question of whether we remain or leave the EU to have that finally determined in a court of law based on an Act of Parliament rushed through against the wishes of the PM, the Government and the majority who voted Leave in the referendum.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @johnredwood
You know the current target is preventing a no deal. Oh and stuff was rushed through due to the unlawful actions of your leader.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @johnredwood
What was unlawful was the court dabbling in politics. If there had been any crisis, why the hell were all the other parties going on their jolly holiday trips to the party conferences? THERE WAS NO CRISIS. Nothing they could say that couldn't have been said in previous 3 yrs.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @scotpolitik @johnredwood
The court wasn't "dabbling" in politics but doing it's job of judicial review. The government was unable to give a reason for 5 weeks of total closure. Party conferences are covered by recess which allows parliament work to continue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
As you'll see from today's sitting there is much more going on than Brexit. Very important business was stifled by this unlawful maneuver and that's now been rectified by the correct checks and balances.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @johnredwood
And if there had been a "crisis" - why the hell were all the politicians going off on their jollies to the party conferences. If even one party had cancelled it and tabled a no confidence motion, then there might have been an ounce of credibility to this unlawful debacle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No one in the case claimed a crisis.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.