If these two had wanted the UK and our contributions to stay, they should have given Cameron a good deal. If they didn’t want us to keep our money and go WTO, they would have given May a good deal. In fact, they want our money in return for subservience.https://mol.im/a/7053839
-
Any second vote would be rigged so any ‘choice’ would result in the full transfer of power from London to Brussels. A few years on and any hater of the referendum result can rest easy knowing they will never have the inconvenience of voting ever again.
How so if WTO is a choice within the leave vote? You want to leave tick leave then select the method. Nothing rigged just necessary clarity.
-
-
It splits the vote on the Leave side doesn't. Remain vs Leave WTV vs Leave with Deal... But until the first vote is implemented. A second vote is undemocratic. From Ancient athens until now (well, 2016), the method of democracy has been Debate. Vote. Implement.
-
Nope it would need to be remain vs leave with a second selection for method. So if leave won by 60% those 60% would also have selected a method so if WTO had the most votes there that would win. Isn't the WA implementation?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.