Did they also think it meant the easiest deal ever and 350 million a week for the NHS?
-
-
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
Hahaha the bus! Last resort, bring up the bus.... It could have been an easy deal if we didn't roll over and surrender to the EU (May's Deal), and the bus was an example of what we could do with the money after Brexit, although I disagree with how they presented it,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lsc194 @NadineDorries
It also turned out to be actually half of that. We now have a far clearer view of what Brexit means in the real world. Remove the unicorns and scaremongering, make it truly binding and let the people vote based on clarity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
The scaremongering is coming entirely from the remain camp- no food if we brexit, no medicine, no planes flying etc- all scaremongering and not true. We know what we were voting for, Parliament is now in contempt of the people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lsc194 @NadineDorries
I agree the scaremongering came primarily from remain. There was also a lot of EU bogeyman falsehoods spread by leave not to mention countless years in the press. So clearer eyed let's just check. One fact checked leaflet from both sides and a binding vote. Seems fair.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
Or instead, why don't we implement the result of the first referendum and leave the EU with no deal, and then hold another referendum on membership in a few years? that would be the fair way to do it...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lsc194 @NadineDorries
The first vote has led to the WA and PD. As you know coming back in a few years would have lose us all the concessions we now enjoy. No deal will damage us (I'm sure you'll disagree) So let's measure twice and cut once.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
No deal will damage us temporarily, but we will thrive after. No deal will harm the EU more than us. If the first referendum result is ignored and we don't leave, it sets a dangerous precedent. What if there's another referendum on another topic and YOUR preference is ignored?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lsc194 @NadineDorries
Looking at WTO terms and the future pitfalls of FTAs (we've only managed 8 out of 40 due for 29/3) The damage will erode us for a significant period of time. Also why would we want to harm our biggest trading partner? I'd expect any further refs to not be so fundamentally flawed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
You have to break some eggs to make an omelette.... Besides, we're in a huge trade defecit to the EU so it will be to our benefit to redress the balance.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What eggs are acceptable? Our car industry? Our non tariff barriers? Continued Irish peace? The union with Scotland? You know what I think I might just have toast.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.