No such thing as a confirmatory referendum. It’s a 2nd Referendum. If the result the first time had been remain, it wouldn’t be happening.
Same pig, new lipstick
#Brexit
-
-
Replying to @NadineDorries @lsc194
Yes because people voting remain knew what that meant. The fact that some think it means crashing out proves that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
Interestingly, every leaver I've spoken to has unanimously agreed on what leaving meant (common mkt, customs union, ecj etc...), it's only been remainers that haven't understood what leave means.... (and look at Parliament now, full of remainers not knowing what to do!) Surprise.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lsc194 @NadineDorries
Did they also think it meant the easiest deal ever and 350 million a week for the NHS?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
Hahaha the bus! Last resort, bring up the bus.... It could have been an easy deal if we didn't roll over and surrender to the EU (May's Deal), and the bus was an example of what we could do with the money after Brexit, although I disagree with how they presented it,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lsc194 @NadineDorries
It also turned out to be actually half of that. We now have a far clearer view of what Brexit means in the real world. Remove the unicorns and scaremongering, make it truly binding and let the people vote based on clarity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
The scaremongering is coming entirely from the remain camp- no food if we brexit, no medicine, no planes flying etc- all scaremongering and not true. We know what we were voting for, Parliament is now in contempt of the people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lsc194 @NadineDorries
I agree the scaremongering came primarily from remain. There was also a lot of EU bogeyman falsehoods spread by leave not to mention countless years in the press. So clearer eyed let's just check. One fact checked leaflet from both sides and a binding vote. Seems fair.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @NadineDorries
Or instead, why don't we implement the result of the first referendum and leave the EU with no deal, and then hold another referendum on membership in a few years? that would be the fair way to do it...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The first vote has led to the WA and PD. As you know coming back in a few years would have lose us all the concessions we now enjoy. No deal will damage us (I'm sure you'll disagree) So let's measure twice and cut once.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.