Jeppy

I won't argue about the definition of hearsay (yours is incorrect) I will say there are many quantifiable facts in a WTO deal and those are part of the various reports. I'm curious to know what facts, or indeed any substantive report, which shows no deal to be a good route?

Just proves your full of shit (I wont argue the definition of hearsay ) The word facts speak for themself various reports are not facts yes there are facts as to how the two runs but it's only shit if you one of the remaining 27 eu plenty other countries like it and prosper fact

The tariff schedules we have with the WTO are facts. Our inability to complete only 8 out of the 40 cut and paste deals due for the 29/3 are facts. The burden of dealing with hardened borders are facts. None of this is contested even by the ERG.

Your still chatting shit show me where the proof is we would be worse off not this could happen that could happen but it will happen you can't you don't know until it happens if it does I would put my hands up and say you were right but you won't do the same if I am

So let's get this straight. I've pointed out several times what I've based my opinion on. You don't agree those constitute facts. Your opinion seems to be based only on a gut feeling. Why would I risk anything based on that?

It's not my opinion ur saying its ur opinion but it's not it's what other people say what MIGHT HAPPEN Its not happened yet we haven't left + yes I'm prepared along with the MAJORITY that voted leave to take that chance if remain had got the majority I would have backed remain

No it is my opinion based on everything I've mentioned. I don't live in a vacuum but take in information and process it. As for you backing remain, thanks. Leave requires careful consideration its affects will last decades.

Thick as the shit you keep tweeting I never said I backed remain your knowledge is nothing of what you have seen but what you think my beleaf is what I will see