MPs have voted 315 to 310 in favour of a bill to rule out leaving with no deal. Has it finally got through to Tory Brexiteers that in the absence of a deal the legal default position would NOT be leaving with no deal?
-
-
Replying to @afneil
17.4 million people voted to leave the EU.Yvette coopers constituency voted 70% to leave the EU. Here she is showboating, carrying out her own agenda for personal gain. oh and brinkmanship. What's even worse does not believe indemocracy.
@LeaveEUOfficial@BrexitCentral .31 replies 84 retweets 333 likes -
Replying to @Mrbaggins7 @afneil and
She isn't trying to (explicity) stop Brexit but a no deal Brexit. Given the harm it would cause seems sensible to have a net.
45 replies 0 retweets 33 likes -
-
Replying to @MiddleSeaSailor @Mrbaggins7 and
That the bills intention is to avoid no deal. However, if that's the form of Brexit you're hoping for, no further discussion is required.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @Mrbaggins7 and
What harm will what cause? Everyone goes on all this perceived harm that a WTO departure will cause, but every time "so called" facts are produced they turn out to be a myth. You carry on with your delusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MiddleSeaSailor @Mrbaggins7 and
The imbalance in tarrifs alone would cause harm. It's funny your keen to not be dictated to by 27 but happy to make it 160? Do you remember voting for WTO elections?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @Mrbaggins7 and
What tarriffs? WTO Art 24 expressly precludes these if we enter into FTA negotiations. Both EU and UK have said they do. Another stupid myth. Many items are free of tariffs anyway; for example aerospace.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiddleSeaSailor @Mrbaggins7 and
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/brexit/no-deal-brexit-and-wto-article-24-explained/ … you mean that one?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElJeppy @Mrbaggins7 and
Did say both parties have to be agreeable and yes there probably would be some tarrif tayloring. But in principle yes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What would the advantage be for the EU to agree. No deal makes them our competitors. Why would the other 160 members agree. Why would countries like the US not seek every advantage once we've lost the extra clout the EU gave us?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.