Jeppy

She isn't trying to (explicity) stop Brexit but a no deal Brexit. Given the harm it would cause seems sensible to have a net.

What are you talking about?

That the bills intention is to avoid no deal. However, if that's the form of Brexit you're hoping for, no further discussion is required.

What harm will what cause? Everyone goes on all this perceived harm that a WTO departure will cause, but every time "so called" facts are produced they turn out to be a myth. You carry on with your delusion.

The imbalance in tarrifs alone would cause harm. It's funny your keen to not be dictated to by 27 but happy to make it 160? Do you remember voting for WTO elections?

We didn't vote for the WA or staying in the customs union.

Very true. Many didn't. We just don't know. So wouldn't it be sensible to get clarity? Something to confirm what we do want?

We were told a vote for leave meant no single market, no customs union and no ECJ. The WA fails to deliver that and we can never exit the EU without their permission. If I want to leave my wife, I go, I don't have to ask for her permission. Divorce settlement after I have left.