Egor Ananyev

@EgorAnanyev

post-doc at lab at . Interested in and . Organizing SfN-Sg mail list for Sg neuro events.

Singapore
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2010.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @EgorAnanyev

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @EgorAnanyev

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Why is Neuroscience Singapore valuable? A video recap of Neuroscience Singapore 2019, with comments from students, organizers, and speakers. The Chapter's mission is to strengthen Singapore neuroscience.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. pro 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    People have a strange idea of what makes a good economy. Cars are unaffordable, as are houses and college. Everyone's in debt. Many are working two jobs. Millions are on gvnt assistance. Healthcare costs are eating the middle class alive. But the economy is great? Great for whom?

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. pro 2019.

    If you want to use Bayes factors, you need to specify the distribution of effect sizes for your hypothesized effect. How do you choose the expected effect size? This paper provides some long-needed suggestions.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 7. stu 2019.

    In fact, even the "conscious" mask was not spatially homogenous, supporting the notion of rivalry / suppression as fragmenting, but not completely obliterating, the masked stimulus. See this paper by :

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 7. stu 2019.

    Neither target nor mask can explain all the effects: Our further modeling work showed the effects could be due to a combination of dorsal/ventral division of labor + divisive normalization (from subsequent APCV poster; work with ):

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 7. stu 2019.

    So which targets are "prioritized for conscious access" (i.e., easier to see)? An important reminder for consciousness studies: what gets suppressed depends on the mask, too! (also see 's work)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 7. stu 2019.

    All three factors -- mask speed, target speed, and target eccentricity -- played a role. Almost all effects were significant, including 3-way interaction. What a mess!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 7. stu 2019.

    We then tested a Continous Flash Suppression (CFS)-like scenario, where slow/fast masks were used to suppress slow/fast stimuli at either central or border eccentricities.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 7. stu 2019.

    Also, at 1s, the "slow" center was a _constant_ proportion of overall size, ~75% of diameter (blue curve). Really weird!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 7. stu 2019.

    The effect only lasted one second, during which the "slow" center slightly shrunk in size, to then disappear (blue curve):

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 7. stu 2019.

    Binocular rivalry of motion undergoes spontaneous spatial segregation (work with , ). I.e., Slow motion in one eye + fast in the other = = slow center / fast surround

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. stu 2019.

    This is the best graphic representation of running a research group I have ever seen.

    Poništi
  13. 3. stu 2019.

    "experiments that directly pit theories of consciousness against each other... Proponents of each theory have agreed to admit [they are] flawed if the outcomes go against them."

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. lis 2019.

    My 1st ever preprint! with .😊We find that stripy patterns are filled-in much better across the blind spot compared to artificial gaps of the same size & location in the visual field. So the blind spot is "special" in some sense and we discuss why it might be so. 👀🧠

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. lis 2019.

    "Second, we reformulate the 2017 results using two-parameter logistic regression (that is, one neuron) and obtain the same performance as that of the 13,451-parameter DNN." 🤨

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. ruj 2019.

    It's a wrap! Thank you everyone for joining us at Neuroscience Singapore 2019, and thank you to all speakers for your fascinating talks! 🤗

    Poništi
  17. 29. ruj 2019.

    The correct answer to the question "Who are you trying to impress?" is "Whom."

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. ruj 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. ruj 2019.

    The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentially have the unintended consequence of spreading misinformation, according to a new study

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. ruj 2019.

    Coffer illusion - when you see the circles, you really can't unsee them

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·