I don't want to sound too contrarian but at some level I worry that this almost Linnaean fascination with categorising fash according to the precise nuances of their hate might obscure more than it reveals
-
-
these people all communicate with each other, they use the same media, individuals move from one specific milieu to another or have 'dual membership' so to speak
-
yeah definitely - it's obviously important to understand the particular variations in different fash cases but if that comes at the expense of (intentionally or not) talking about these terms like they're sects isolated from each other then that's...unhelpful
-
I'm not even sure what the blinder is that prevents more people from seeing it holistically
-
yeah I'm unsure too - it might be the way the media operates, it might be that it is somehow tactically advantageous for fash to create that impression, maybe it benefits lib antifa orgs (which are definitely a thing here) to be able to get Scoops on New Fash Groups I dunno
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I blame prestige tv (not really but fascists shouldn't get to name things except as later fits the rest of the world's convenience)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm imagining someone trying to explain the concept of incel to Hitler, and him looking increasingly concerned.
-
"...wo ist das 'Kekistan'? Indien?"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
fine, but why not both?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
: Boys In Zinc (Alexeivich)