I still think #Prop22 and #AB5 are deeply flawed. The laws should compell @Uber and @Lyft to provide benefits to any drivers putting in hours like full-timer (with a min rides per hour), but not required to cover those working few hours here and there for extra side income. Then,
-
-
That’s literally what prop 22 does though!
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
Does it? I can’t find anything or much about it besides adding exemptions for the app-based services.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
From the gov: https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=22&year=2020 … “Health Insurance Stipend. For drivers who normally work more than 15 hours per week (not including waiting time), this measure requires that companies help pay for health insurance.”
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
It’s good to learn of these, but I do agree with
@wezleytsai this shouldn’t be confined to “app-based” ride services. Feel like this should be standard for all “gig” works.1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Yes, hard to have too much complexity in voter based props though so best to keep them simple. Here’s the full proposal that Uber is advocating for, though: https://ubernewsroomapi.10upcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Working-Together-Priorities.pdf …
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.