Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
Yes, I'm glad that 22 does require companies to pay for gig workers' healthcare. There's a lot of flat-out misinformation out there about what is in 22 (including in Li & Kurtis's posts), which is upsetting.
If you're interested in some of the philosophical arguments on what flex work should look like, read this. Uber advocates that governments require gig companies to deposit funds into a "benefits fund", on an hourly basis (pg12): https://ubernewsroomapi.10upcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Working-Together-Priorities.pdf …
The healthcare benefits defined in prop 22, just like the minimum wage and the other benefits, are low and available for few drivers.
The below text seems reasonable to me, but I can understand if not everyone agrees. However I do think that the "22 denies drivers healthcare" arguments in anti-22 articles are misleading if they don't address 22's healthcare provisions.pic.twitter.com/oMRsTBINEk
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
You should vote NO on proposition 22
