Idk. I’m so much less annoyed by uber advertising in their own app than anywhere else. People dislike this because it effectively educates riders about harms *to them*. (And probably believes it misleads about harm to drivers?) https://twitter.com/GregBensinger/status/1317885687207636992 …
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
W odpowiedzi do @adam_zethraeus
It's severely lacking context and it's not just happening in the rider app though. My understanding from CA friends is that it's a blitz ad campaign they can't seem to avoid
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @ZacSweers @adam_zethraeus
Sound familiar?pic.twitter.com/T2ITVhzqFU
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @EdwardStarcraft @adam_zethraeus
"all/both sides do it" argument doesn't hold when it sucks regardless of who does it :). My point was more that Californians, by virtue of not being a battleground state politically, are not used to the kind of campaign tactics Uber employs. Same negative reaction happened in ATX
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @ZacSweers @adam_zethraeus
I think props have always had a lot of contention in CA, and in politics spamming seems to be the current metagame. When spam runs rampant (whether or not SMS, App Store, Twitter, etc) it's the responsibility of platform teams to effectively control it.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Unfortunately is that the winners are the ones who effectively utilized the system -- so why would they change the system? Imagine if there was a prop to outlaw political SMS, and they decided not to SMS people about the prop. The opposition would spam everyone and would win.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.