wait, crypto conferences accept new protocols with no working implementation? and with security proofs covering only a small part of the attack surface, with no formal verification :)
No disrespect intended. Trying to clarify what appears to be a misunderstanding about what part of WireGuard is being analyzed in these papers. The key exchange is (with the three horizontal lines) NoiseIK. That's all.
-
-
I looked at the paper as it is. I don’t know how much you changed from NoiseIK. If it’s the same as NoiseIK than that seems like two issues not one.
-
A month ago I wrote an HN comment that suggested that Wireguard was distinguishable from Noise and Trevor chided me for it. The Wireguard paper itself says: the handshake is NoiseIK.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.