As of writing, the the OpenBSD kernel WireGuard implementation clocks in at 3,322 LoC, even smaller than Linux's implementation.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Patches for this have now been posted, alongside a script to try it out: 1) https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=158926407905492&w=2 … 2) https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=158926356005344&w=2 … 3) https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2020-May/005427.html …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
looks sane from what i've seen so far. btw, it will want a small patch to etc/netstart adding to "ifmstart". the installer also parses hostname files (src/distrib/miniroot/install.sub) but i think that will be ok as-is (skips clonables except trunk/svlan/vlan).
-
Thanks for the suggestion! Matt fixed this up here: https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=5d15fce0763ff378344aaa3cf9be0e72095aa443 … We're working on some final touches and hopefully we'll have something ready to send to tech@ shortly. Then floodgates will open with other useful feedback, I hope!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
New conversation
-
-
-
Amazing!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How that is a great news!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope it supports AES as an option someday. Seems almost pointless to use UDP with less throughput than OpenSSH has over TCP.
-
Actually faster than I was expecting. I'd have to run some tests for power usage, but trying to avoid distractions. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=158927684510808&w=2 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.