Very striking that @theresa_may plans 5 more years of austerity(see @TheIFS) but is trying to pretend otherwise. She deserves to be asked...
-
-
Notice you're ignoring the fact the IFS have said your party would increase the deficit by £37 billion.
-
And that your party would have taxes at their highest ever peacetime level.
-
Could you quote where that is states "taxes at their highest ever peace level" or is that like all Tory smears untrue
-
Be quite difficult for them to be higher than they were in the late forties/fifties, I'd imagine.
-
Well, that's the IFS statement, look it up.
-
Is this same IFS study that says Tory immigration plans leave £6bn hole in *their* plans and which say Labours plans bring surplus in 2020?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Labour manifesto plans will take 7% off poor while only taking 3% off rich is that Fair.pic.twitter.com/0lBbeH8fvt
-
While according to this the conservatives will continue to take 10% from the poor whilst giving to the very richest?? Which is better?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
The problem we have is. £20-£30 a week is nothing to MPs on their salary. They see that amount As pocket change and think poor do to!
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo -
Still haven't forgotten Cameron saying that Tax credits would not be cut when specifically questioned during last GE campaign.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo -
-
IFS on the labour party - highest level of taxation since the 1950s
-
Source?
-
..the
@TheIFS.The tax burden could rise to around 37 per cent under Labour by 2022, higher than at any time since 1950, according to the IFS -
I meant link to the source.
-
From what I've read from your article and other says that Labour are being optimistic (understandable). 1/2
-
However IFS have also said Cons aren't being honest with their costings. It seems the IFS are split on this one. 2/2
-
To be fair, both being dishonest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.