Don't settle for somebody who only values you because they've learned specific information about you that updated their priors. Find somebody who loves you unconditionally.
-
-
Because they then love you before knowing anything about you. They don’t really love *you* at all.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Unconditional would also mean “if you tried to kill them”, “if one day and were a completely different person”, and “if you were actually a strawberry”. It’s possible to love everyone and everything, but this cannot be the basis of a relationship with a specific person.
-
Only love somebody who would have loved you even if you'd been a strawberry.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You missed your calling as a Bayesian probability comedian.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
False. An "unconditioned prior about you" ≠ "featureless blank template," since it's mapped to an identity. In romance, identity isn't an adequate predicate for love, but it can be in contexts like parenting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The fact that people who follow *you* needed this to be explained...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is terrible advice. Love is fundamentally a placement of the person you love into the loved one category once sufficient interactions with that person have met one’s personal threshold for entry.
-
There’s is no way to update your priors in any fair non-biased way when it comes to love-relationships that will actually deliver the usual desired outcomes: loyalty, intimacy, longevity of relationship.
-
The attempt to do so reveals a level of autism that will all but guarantee misery for most people.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there's actually a problem if someone other than your mom says they'll love you unconditionally- in that person's own mind, they do. reminds me of the Futurama episode where Bender has a Neutron(?) bomb inside of him, that'll go off if he says a certain word that he's never used
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about the “common prior assumption” in economics? It’s wrong, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not sure if this isn't deeper than you intended I get the Bayesian word play about conditioning But the idea that love is refined over time based on new evidence gives me the creeps I prefer unconditional love, in both senses
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
still haven’t figured this one out it seems
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm relieved to hear this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.