I assumed this was a bit of humor but judging by the responses it appears to be deadly serious
-
-
-
I *really* would not have guessed that this would be one of the tweets that people tried to interpret seriously. I should have updated more after the Great Apple-Potato Fiasco of 2017.
-
I didn't read the replies before replying, twitter is lame like that. That you would not have guessed is unsurprising, sadly. I fell for it. I take you as one who actually devotes their time to stuff of this nature, not someone joking around. I am silly.
-
Well, god knows if there's anything my Internet presence conveys, it's how terribly seriously I take myself and my total lack of a sense of humor. [THIS IS A JOKE. HE IS NOT BEING SERIOUS.]
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Very good compile-time optimization in a language where every boolean evaluates to true.
-
Purely truth-based algorithms are much safer than algorithms in which lots of expressions are false, right?
-
100% provable
-
The whole program is a nullary function
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The great plague of our time is insistence on the equality of outcome, rather than equality of opportunity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meanwhile, in a California garage, AGI “AlphaBern” has determined a solution for equality of outcome, and is beginning to construct an army of robots created in the image of a picture it noticed as an attachment to multiple articles about AI...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you serious? Genuine query.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how can you say that? inequality is a fact of life, a veritable human constant, a thing the current era declares must be removed to engender utopia. not to mention the error by input. it's perception could result in being more skewed than our own, at a higher rate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I definitely agree about the AI, but then please name a time in our past where inequality was not present. (excluding our hunther-gatherer past)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But that assumes that the designers of AI systems are the ones equipped to determine what the equalities are. We need to seriously address political and social biases in the relevant disciplines.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
china = usa = russia = canada
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"only use equalities" Wtf does this even mean? "Socially conscious" AI algos sounds like a recipe for a dystopia.
-
Whoosh
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What’s an example of what this could / should look like in practice?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
