E.g. I agree with all of: "You can't get to AGI with *only*:" - more hardware - gradient descent - currently published techniques for RL that I've read about - currently published ideas the eminent scientist has read about
-
-
Show this thread
-
You can get to AGI with Y, though. Or Z. Or
. And even if the eminent author has some ideas about Y, they haven't thought about Z, and even I've never considered
. Deepmind could be working on
right now. And that's the problem with trying to guess timelines.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nice to know i'm not the only one who'as ever thought about an AI scientist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.