I have a lot of detractors not smart enough to understand large numbers. I say X is better than (bignum >> googolplex) people suffering the tiniest noticeable pain, and the # gets rounded down to "billions" or "quintillions". https://twitter.com/just_an_initial/status/940110359133851648 …
So what is the exact amount of pain such that it's better that a googol people have that pain rather than one person have the tiniest physically possible increment more pain than that? Or do you also deny that preferences should be noncircular?
-
-
You could have the disutility of the situation depend only on the number of people plus the number of quants of pain per person.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.