In theory, no, but changes to the tax code have complex consequences, and the bill was written rapidly, poorly, and without analysis.
-
-
-
And the effect of badly considered significant proposed changes is to create lots of economic uncertainty, which itself imposes large costs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That was my sense as well. Tax incidence presumably falls mostly on the universities. Phase-in time seems important. Immediate = bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes you are wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gotta understand There is Princeton etc which can and shd pay more to someone and there is everyone else
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
US grad school tuition isn't rent because everyone gets waivers. If schools do away with both, only Q to ask is why tf this bs even existed.
-
Well OK, it's rent, but extracted from funding agencies not students. Which I guess is bad news for students: no way schools'll cut overhead
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is there somewhere that explains your argument in more than 140 characters?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, Dr. Y
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was my reading as well. But it affects colleges so won’t we think of the children?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.