Amazing. "Pregnant trans men". What if the concept violates basic logic? As I said yesterday, I support trans people, not magical thinking. https://twitter.com/VarminWay/status/922195439075520513 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BretWeinstein
I agree with Varmin. Just change the language to "pregnant people" to avoid a gender loophole for child protection. No big deal. Get over it
26 replies 2 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @geoliberal @BretWeinstein
How I do dearly wish that humans were built logically enough to *see* all language fights as necessarily empty tautologies.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ESYudkowsky @BretWeinstein
And with no element of truth at stake, logically speaking? Be nice. What is niceness here? Not using words on people who don’t want them.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ESYudkowsky @BretWeinstein
It isn’t true that “female” means nothing more to anyone than producing the larger gamete. If that was all that meant, *you* wouldn’t care.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ESYudkowsky @BretWeinstein
To whatever extent “female” has *any* connotations other than the larger gamete, it’s not a matter of logic to call a pregnant person that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
And the previous tweet is meant to express a simple logical point, not a political one.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.