again, this is a bad example for that argument- rape and murder laws are clearly on the top of the stack of things everyone needs to learn
It would be like saying robotic cars can drive 10mph over speed limit. There’s an enormous game of pretend going on that can’t be admitted.
-
-
that's a case in which you fail to inform that people can break the law w/o issue, which is opposite of what we're talking about
-
Opposite and symmetrical. We pretend people can’t drive 10mph over, and that citizens can obey 300,000 pages of law, because law is law.
-
the risks are asymmetrical- consider forgetting to mention that it's not okay to stone someone to death for heresy
-
while it's sometimes okay to kill ppl (in self-defense), not an argument that you didn't realize a kind of killing wasn't implicitly allowed
-
and as far as the car analogy goes- we have driving tests for a reason
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.