#UnpopularOpinion: Unavoidable ignorance of a law, because your society has too many laws to learn, is a defense.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/922139323457200128 …
I do think it’s reasonable to claim ignorance of a law you were not told about, or a demonstrably common comprehension failure not mentioned
-
-
And again to be clear, I’m advocating *telling people* not giving free passes. We’ve come to take for granted that the law must be intuited!
-
same- I think our point of disagreement is on what to do about not knowing this law in particular. you're saying to simplify everything...
-
... i'm saying it's obviously part of the set of things that need to be known (through education/naturalization) even if law remains complex
-
My guess is that society is incapable of that step. It disrupts the pretense that all the other laws are knowable and okay to enforce.
-
It would be like saying robotic cars can drive 10mph over speed limit. There’s an enormous game of pretend going on that can’t be admitted.
-
that's a case in which you fail to inform that people can break the law w/o issue, which is opposite of what we're talking about
-
Opposite and symmetrical. We pretend people can’t drive 10mph over, and that citizens can obey 300,000 pages of law, because law is law.
-
the risks are asymmetrical- consider forgetting to mention that it's not okay to stone someone to death for heresy
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.