It is actually a good paper, in contrast to my terrible 2010 manuscript which was forcibly grabbed from my drafts folder and published.
-
-
Show this thread
-
But if you want something way more informal, though incomplete, there's multiple old intros I wrote indexed here:https://arbital.com/p/logical_dt/
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems FDT is fundamentally right, but I fear its real world implications are overstated in the direction of "always cooperate".
-
eg: imagine 2 worlds w/ periodic chances to defect: inhabitants of A are Wary & nearly always catch you; in B they're Lax & nearly never do.
-
Whether FDT says to always cooperate or always defect depends fully on which world you think you're more likely in. No? (& if not, why not?)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How does the FDT agent act upon seeing an empty box in Transparent Newcomb?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Typo on page 26: "We confront Carl [...] and ask him what would have happened if he had taken both boxes."-you meant one box. Great otherws
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your work is amazing. Thanks for sharing with us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.