GIannandrea has a point. Destruction of everything has enormous negative utility but probability is exceedingly small in his informed view.
-
-
-
In the article he argues it's not "imminent". I count that as a derail because to ignore extinction, it should be *at least* 10 years out.
-
(That's sarcasm. Total global catastrophe is more important than biased algorithms even if it's *11* years out, so long as it's not 15.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Strangely, these same folks rarely apply that same derail to other existential risks such as AGW.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The idea that these two groups who are pretty much equally worried about alignment problems are discoursive antagonists is probably wrong
-
Hopefully the researchers really in it are aware of and working on both. The antagonistic framing is becoming pervasive.
-
Whatever non-overlapping section of the Venn diagram actually exists, their effort should be informing those who are aware of neither.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This reminds me of when you wrote about Price's equation and the Frodo gene
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AGI, biased algorithms, WW3... They can be hardly controlled or countered specifically. All part of same social human issue: counter that!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"danger that may be lurking inside the machine-learning algorithms" oh wow
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.