I wonder if it's possible today to set up a proof-of-work labor that humans do most cost-effectively, but computers can verify.
-
-
Generally, if computers can verify reliably that means you have a loss function, and that's the main thing you need to train an algo.
-
But if winning at chess in 70s count, then winning at SC2 or a harder game today should too. Just look for things that are hard to train now
-
Even something like detecting many barely different things in multiple very different categories in very high q photos probably counts tho.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
''Define what you mean by genius'' - Are you smarter than Sam Harris?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.