I support vigilante punching, not state supported punching.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't initiate violence, but I think it's sometimes reasonable to include specific and credible threats as violence. (140-ch approximation.)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Where's "No, and feel really guilty about it"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In self defense hell yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For rule utilitarians, the answer is obvious; no. For act utilitarians, it's ineffective, so the answer is still no;https://fee.org/articles/using-violence-against-fascists-plays-right-into-their-hands/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also: Given Hitler's slavish devotion to obeying the law(post-Beerhall-Pusch), 99+% of the actual fascists have government power / badges.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wouldn't this technically change dependent on the goal?+1) Those who are fascist actually punch anti-fascists, more than canceling goals...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://www.facebook.com/edsaperia/posts/10102447832286640 … A London discussion ---
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
D. Only if you're sure you won't get caught.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Social shunning, sure. Punching absolutely not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.