We mostly judge minds via duck test: if looks, walks, & quacks like duck, its duck. Big implications for future AI. https://www.overcomingbias.com/2017/07/philosophy-vs-duck-tests.html …
-
-
I'm unclear what the relevant feature here is. I'd guess you could simulate mouse behaviors with a neural network trained on mouse behavior.
-
And if you made a well-constructed small fur-covered bot that acted that way, I'd think people would assume it *was* a mouse.
-
(Which doesn't imply that ML is at the level of sophistication of a mouse, just that our perceptions are fairly easy to fool.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some ml algos *look* smarter by trading off generality: mice can't play go or caption images
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.