Some people think "For every false statement, there's another even more false statement." But nothing could be further from the truth.
-
-
Same goes for 2^45239963-1, it's just gonna take my computer another day to figure that out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is more irrational to believe a conjunction "91 is prime and 92 is prime" than just "91 is prime". But they are equally false.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In practical context, even in binary logic, "false" could be weighted by undesired consequences, which can hardly have an absolute limit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolute falsehood stands in binary statements only. It should be "For every non-binary false statement, there are more false statements".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@arthurb disagreed. There are logics where the truth value of a statement is not just 0 or 1.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not in relevance logic (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-relevance/ …) or other paraconsistent logics (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-paraconsistent/ …).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.