All I want from a political leader is a realistic plan to defend civilization for the next few centuries. Everything else is rounding error.
-
-
I don't want our political leader to be a politician. I want them to be an actual 'leader', i.e.g more fore-sighted than their followers.
-
What would a plan to "defend civ for next few centuries" have looked like if authored by best planner of 1700s?
-
The US Constitution. That's what they were thinking at the Constitutional Convention. Except that they were improving, not defending.
-
Agreed. And it mostly worked, amendments notwithstanding. But was it so clear at the outset that it would work? Or survivorship bias?
-
The Founders were at least _trying_ to think long-term, and felt a duty to future generations to get things as right as they could.
-
Agree w sentiment of your call to foresight, but "centuries" seems unrealistic. 3-5 decades, sure. 300y, nobody can tell which plan is good
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'd burst into tears in gratitude if a politician grokked supply/demand, NGDP, and the alignment problem being as hard as computer security.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.