If we build an AI that reasons as well as a human, we'll regret it. Humans only get away with being this crazy because we're pretested.
-
-
How long would it take iterating online interactions with several hundred thousand people to match?
-
Online interaction testing is not full-lifecycle. Testing crazy humans as only preteens would not produce nice crazy human adult societies.
-
Online interaction (say through Facebook) would cover a pretty broad swath. Online necessitates literacy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree. Selection for 'mental health' is overlooked in most models of cognitive evolution. My 2 cents: http://bit.ly/2peYYWA
-
BTW aren't there various dimensions w/ wide signal distributions? In place of "mental heath" can we insert "non-procreative sex behaviors"?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.