When a billionaire gives away money to (real) philanthropy, the @Forbes 400 ought to rank them as if they still have that money.
-
-
That shouldn't be an incentive, maybe they shouldn't care about such a superficial thing? Or does it have added bonuses
-
But then, maybe we should care more about encouraging donations than fixing millionaire's "character"
-
Doe we know that billionaires care about their forbes position?
-
That I don't know. For Eliezer to answer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
then you can do one better and make the list exclusively about donations to charity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You think that type will make good giving decisions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm expecting people vain enough to care about Fortune 400 to still not give to charity even then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.