Why?
-
-
-
Because some billionaires care about their
@Forbes 400 position and shouldn't be penalized for charity. -
That shouldn't be an incentive, maybe they shouldn't care about such a superficial thing? Or does it have added bonuses
-
But then, maybe we should care more about encouraging donations than fixing millionaire's "character"
-
Doe we know that billionaires care about their forbes position?
-
That I don't know. For Eliezer to answer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Alternatively, perhaps Forbes could make another well publicized list ranking people by total donated to charity.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Can they accurately judge real philanthropy? Might be a good idea even if they can’t.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not a cumulative philanthropy ranking?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.