Can you recommend an overview of everything wrong with probabilistic epistemology? I haven’t found one. There’s lots of papers that say “this particular objection is fatal, so why don’t you guys stop pretending,” but maybe no compendium of those?
Jaynes did sometimes dismiss problems outside his mastery, which was a flaw. That said, MIRI has done pioneering work on applying probability to logical sentences and relaxing the assumption of logical omniscience. http://intelligence.org/files/LogicalInduction.pdf …
-
-
This is an interesting paper, and not relevant to Jayne’s misunderstanding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.